Obama’s Malpractice

Why the health-care bill isn’t reform.

Pub­lished Nov 14, 2009
From the mag­a­zine issue dated Nov 23, 2009

Robert J. Samuelson

There is an air of absur­dity to what is mis­tak­enly called “health-care reform.” Everyone knows that the United States faces mas­sive gov­ern­mental budget deficits as far as cal­cu­la­tors can project, driven heavily by an aging pop­u­la­tion and uncon­trolled health costs. [Read More →]

Analyzing Democrats’ Word Shift On Health Care

By David Welna of NPR
November 17, 2009

Listen to the Story
When Pres­i­dent Obama and con­gres­sional Democ­rats began their drive this year to revamp health poli­cies, they promised to expand health care cov­erage and to make it more afford­able.
The health bill passed by the House — and a sim­ilar mea­sure pending in the Senate — boost the number of people [Read More →]

Poll: Deep divisions linger on health care

November 16, 2009
WASHINGTON — As the Senate pre­pares to take up leg­is­la­tion aimed at over­hauling the nation’s health care system, Pres­i­dent Barack Obama and the Democ­rats are still strug­gling to win the battle for public opinion. A new Wash­ington Post-ABC News poll shows Amer­i­cans deeply divided over the pro­posals under con­sid­er­a­tion and majori­ties pre­dicting higher costs ahead.
But Repub­lican [Read More →]

Utahns’ opposition to health reform tied to disapproval of the president

Nearly 60 per­cent of voters polled dis­like Obama’s pro­posal.
By Paul Beebe, Christo­pher Smart And Matt Canham of The Salt Lake Tri­bune
November 16, 2009
If there was any doubt Utahns don’t like the health reform bills moving through Con­gress, a poll of reg­is­tered voters com­mis­sioned by The Salt Lake Tri­bune should put the uncer­tainty to rest.
Fifty-seven per­cent [Read More →]

Dems target GOP ‘no’ health care reform voters

Democ­rats are emailing thou­sands of people who backed Barack Obama last year in two GOP-controlled Penn­syl­vania con­gres­sional dis­tricts, asking them to protest their rep­re­sen­ta­tives’ recent “no” votes on health care reform leg­is­la­tion.
— Thomas Fitzgerald — Philadel­phia Inquirer Staff Writer

House health bill includes Medicaid relief for states

Expan­sion of cov­erage would come with $23.5 bil­lion in aid
By Aaron C. Davis — Wash­ington Post Staff Writer
November 16, 2009
Wedged in the House health-care bill is $23.5 bil­lion that looks a lot more like new fed­eral stim­ulus spending than any­thing to do with national health-care reform.

The barely debated pot of money would allow Con­gress to con­tinue pumping bil­lions [Read More →]

Reform looks less likely in Texas

By Karyn Harlow — Dallas Morning News Letter to the Editor
November 15, 2009
I am encour­aged that health care leg­is­la­tion passed the House. At the same time, I know that hoping for real health care reform in our state is a pipe dream, given our cur­rent rep­re­sen­ta­tion in the House and Senate. Even if a bill is passed in the [Read More →]

Health bill foes solicit funds for economic study

The U.S. Chamber of Com­merce and an assort­ment of national busi­ness groups opposed to Pres­i­dent Obama’s health-care reform effort are col­lecting money to finance an eco­nomic study that could be used to por­tray the leg­is­la­tion as a job killer and threat to the nation’s economy, according to an e-mail solic­i­ta­tion from a top Chamber offi­cial.
— Michael D. Shear — Wash­ington Post Staff Writer

The best, most truthful studies always orig­i­nate with a sponsor who dic­tates what the find­ings will be. That is why most so many consultant’s studies are worth­less.
— Mike Kroll

Congress is on a health-reform path that will raise premiums

HEALTH-CARE reform is nec­es­sary, but what is unfolding in Wash­ington, D.C., is the wrong solu­tion to a legit­i­mate problem. Leg­is­la­tion cur­rently on the table will result in dra­mat­i­cally higher pre­miums based on costly, above-market min­imum ben­e­fits and a weak require­ment that people pur­chase and main­tain cov­erage. Both of these policy choices by Con­gress would mean more expen­sive pre­miums for con­sumers.
— Slade Gorton — Seattle Time Op-Ed

Health care reform a headache

… I wonder what kind of health care reform Amer­i­cans envi­sioned a year ago.

Did they expect the health care fairy to come down and sprinkle health care reform dust over hos­pi­tals and doc­tors? Did they think drug com­pa­nies would come around and say, “Aw shucks, y’all, we’ll just give you this stuff for free?” Did people not think that securing health insur­ance for the 46 mil­lion unin­sured was going to cost some­body some money?
— Tom Bohs of The Jackson Sun

Register Login